-
8.0
49107
8.0 |
Mojo
Carries so little flab that it really does deserve to be another worldwide smasheroo. Print edition only
-
7.3
48677
7.3 |
AltSounds
There are tracks here which can be added to the Green Day cannon, but the trouble is there’s just as many misses as there are hits
Read Review
-
7.0
48453
7.0 |
PopMatters
This full-length nevertheless reaffirms Green Day is still capable of an engaging LP, and it rights the course for the ¡Uno!/¡Dos!/¡Tre! trilogy after a shaky start
Read Review
-
7.0
48489
7.0 |
Rolling Stone
The band follows lineal threads from Dookie-era punk into all manner of overheated angst
Read Review
-
7.0
48285
7.0 |
Drowned In Sound
A reliably fun, garagey treat
Read Review
-
6.0
48286
6.0 |
State
What is evident within this trilogy is the attempt to forge modern expectations with old school sensibility, even if it doesn’t always work
Read Review
-
6.0
48301
6.0 |
NME
These albums remain too cluttered with filler to measure up against the best of the band's stuff
Read Review
-
6.0
48354
6.0 |
Evening Standard
There’s nothing here you haven’t heard a thousand times before and melody is an elusive butterfly forever out of reach
Read Review
-
6.0
48408
6.0 |
The Scotsman
Individually, these tracks wouldn’t amount to much more than throwaway fun but, cumulatively, they create another very likeable melodic collection
Read Review
-
6.0
48456
6.0 |
BBC
Middling-to-fair central act of seminal pop-punks’ 2012 album trilogy
Read Review
-
6.0
48485
6.0 |
Slant Magazine
Much like its immediate predecessor, Dos suggests that the album triptych probably should've been edited into one strong album rather than spread out over multiple releases
Read Review
-
6.0
48827
6.0 |
Spin
¡Dos! has enough arresting songs to keep hope alive
Read Review
-
6.0
49085
6.0 |
Q
The braver Green Day are, the better they are. Print edition only
-
5.8
48503
5.8 |
Paste Magazine
More-so than Uno!, the first of the band’s 2012 trilogy, Dos! bears the strain of a man—and a songwriter—crying out for help
Read Review
-
4.2
48703
4.2 |
A.V. Club
The sophomore slump of a trilogy that’s shaping up to be far less fun than it was supposed to be
Read Review
-
4.0
48581
4.0 |
The Guardian
Oddly leaden and largely witless
Read Review
-
4.0
48500
4.0 |
Consequence Of Sound
With a lack of depth, a messy focus, and a bloated sense of evolution, ¡Dos! isn’t only a forgettable sequel to a bland predecessor, but a slip down the ladder Green Day has attempted to extend for over a decade
Read Review
-
4.0
48394
4.0 |
The Observer
A set that's oddly leaden and largely witless
Read Review
-
4.0
48315
4.0 |
The Irish Times
So – one down, two down. Already, we have concerns for No 3
Read Review
-
4.0
49354
4.0 |
Tone Deaf
After the release of Uno!, Green Day sounded more vital than they had in years. But now, they just sound tired
Read Review
-
3.0
48436
3.0 |
Sputnik Music (staff)
It’s still not clear what Green Day hoped to achieve with all this crap
Read Review
-
2.0
48397
2.0 |
No Ripcord
Why do albums like this get made?
Read Review
-